My experience with the Sony Alpha 700

Sony Alpha A700
On September 6th, 2007, Sony has released the Alpha 700, a DSLR that can be regarded the legitimate successor of the Konica Minolta 7D. Since my 7D showed some signs of age (occasional symptoms of "first frame black", missing screen protector and thumb rubber), I bought a A700 in November as a replacement.

This is not a full review. There are many of these out there. I have linked to some of them here. Rather than listing all of the camera's features I will give my impressions of the Alpha 700 after some time of real life use and address a few points that I think are overlooked in most reviews. I don't try to be objective or fair, I'm stating my opinion. I'm comparing it mainly to the 7D and 7, so this review will be most useful for owners of these cameras. I never used the A100, which already had some of the improvements that also went into the A700.

Features that are missing (really?)

Live View

Sony has been criticized for omitting Live View, a feature that is present in both the Canon 40D and the Nikon D300, two DSLRs that were released at around the same time as the A700. I'm not sure if I really miss this feature. I have not used these other cameras, but the way it was implemented there really sounds awkward. On the 40D, the mirror flips down and up again for AF during Live View. This is because it still uses phase detection AF, and this only works when the mirror is down, and incoming light is diverted towards the AF sensors. Furthermore, when using DOF preview, the signal from the sensor is not boosted to always retain the original brightness. And, of course, the image from the sensor is only displayed on the rear screen, not in the viewfinder.

The Nikon D300's implementation is only a little more sophisticated. It adds contrast detection AF during Live View. While this avoids the mirror action and blackout of phase detection AF, the performance seems to be no match of phase detection AF. Nikon advertises this as “tripod mode”, which says a lot.

Until the technology is there to use the full potential of taking the viewfinder image directly from the sensor, I think I can live without Live View. Read some more about this topic in my essay titled “The future of digital SLRs”.

Top LCD

The A700 does not have a top LCD, and many say it should have one. In my opinion such a LCD was already obsolete on the film 7, which had one. Once you have a large rear LCD there's no point in having another small LCD that displays only basic information and which you can't look at when you have the camera mounted on a tripod at eye level. And when you use the camera hand-held, it's no problem tilting the camera if necessary to look at the rear display. Consequently, the 7D had no top LCD, and I didn't miss it at all. With the A700 it will be no different.

Exposure compensation knob

There was an outcry when Sony removed the knob for exposure compensation. While it first sounds like this goes against the design principle of “one function, one knob”, I can't say that I really miss the knob. Already with the film 7 I set up the camera to assign exposure compensation to the rear thumbwheel. The 7D also had this function, as does the A700, and I almost never used the exposure compensation knob. Since I also rarely use M mode, the rear thumbwheel is almost always available for exposure compensation (and in M mode, when the rear thumbwheel controls either aperture or exposure time, you don't need exposure compensation at all).

Flash mode switch

This is a switch that I missed on the 7D. With the film 7 you could easily switch between normal flash, wireless flash, rear sync flash and red-eye reduction. With the 7D you have to go to the menu to switch between flash modes. Unfortunately the A700 didn't bring back this switch. With the new Fn button you can switch flash modes more quickly than with the 7D, but I think a separate flash mode switch would still be better.

Grip sensor (on EU model)

Grip sensor, just a dummy
Some A700 sold in the EU do not have a grip sensor due to RoHS regulations. My A700, however, at first sight appears to have the sensors. Closer examination revealed that the sensors are not functional. They are dummies.

Since I never use Eye-Start, which the grip sensor supports, I can live without it. This, however, is really a shame for Sony's engineering department. It surely can't be impossible to find and use materials for the grip sensor that comply with EU regulations!

Intervalometer

The 7D had quite a flexible intervalometer feature, and the A700 doesn't. While this is an interesting feature for some, I never got around to use it in real life, so I can't say I'm missing it.

Pipe dreams

Before the A700's release there was much speculation about it. Some hoped for (or even predicted) a full-frame sensor, 10 fps, GPS, WLAN, etc. Of course, these are very specific features, and expensive ones, too. You can't reasonably expect them in an amateur/semi-pro level camera.

Things that did not change

Some things were not or only slightly changed by Sony compared to the 7 or 7D, and this was a good decision most of the time. Among these things are:

  • CompactFlash support. Memory Stick support was added.
  • Flash system. You can still use all Minolta D and Sony Alpha flashes.
  • Menu design and most symbols.
  • Basic user interface design.
  • Lens mount, of course.
  • Exposure metering. It was already near perfect for many years.
  • Preset modes. These are, however, no longer accessible as easily as on the 7 and 7D (read more about it below).
  • Vertical Grip available
  • Studio flash socket
  • Remote release socket
  • DMF, AF/MF button, exposure shift in M mode

Things that were improved

Things improved from the 7D:

  • Better display (larger, higher resolution, better contrast)
  • Higher pixel count, of course
  • Higher frame rate
  • More AF sensors and center double-cross sensor (see below)
  • AF assist light on the body
  • Higher x-sync speed
  • More exposure metering cells
  • Wireless remote release included (see below)
  • ISO setting in 1/3 stop increments
  • Configurable Auto ISO range
  • Creative Styles for JPEGs
  • Weather sealing
  • Precise battery charge display
  • White-balance bracketing
  • D-Range optimizer, with bracketing
  • HDMI output (see below)
  • RGB histogram
  • 16:9 modes
  • Compressed RAW files

Obsolete features

A well-featured camera like the A700 always has a few functions that are rarely used. Here's my list:

Eye-Start

Well, what can I say. This function was always off with my film 7, and I never missed it on the 7D. The A700 brought it back, but I don't think I'll ever use it. Fortunately Sony didn't waste space for a separate switch on the body.

Printing from the camera

I wonder who is really using this function, especially with a semi-pro DSLR. Everybody with such a camera also owns a computer, and if you print at home, the computer can do it much better than the camera alone.

Scene modes

A camera could have only M and A mode, and I wouldn't complain. Unfortunately, the scene modes take up space on the mode dial. I'd rather have one dial position for each of the three preset modes than the scene modes on the mode dial.

Auto mode, auto ISO, auto white-balance

I like to be in control, so I don't use these features.

Handling

Switches and buttons

All buttons, switches and dials have a firm, solid feeling, like you are used from the 7D. The AF/MF button is significantly flatter than on the 7D and is sometimes at bit difficult to use.

The joystick was changed from the 7D. It's now a 4-way joystick which doubles as a button. On the 7 and 7D it was actually a ring on 4 buttons with an additional button in the middle. With the 7 and 7D you'd move your thumb between the center button and outer ring while navigating through the menus, while with the A700 you rest the thumb on the joystick and then only press it or shift it in one of the four directions. This makes it a lot easier to select individual AF sensors than on the 7 and 7D.

The release button has a changed feel. On earlier Minolta cameras, there was a firm pressure point, and when you went beyond it, there was only a very short travel and a hard stop. This sometimes caused the problem that you gave the camera a kick just when you released. The release button on the A700 has a softer pressure point, and a much longer travel beyond it. The camera releases when you press the button beyond the pressure point, but before you hit the stop (and in fact, you often don't hit the stop at all). This avoids causing unintended camera shake. The release button on the A700 first feels odd when you're used to earlier designs, but after a while you notice its virtues.

The three rear top plate buttons (DRIVE, WB, ISO) are hard to reach when you hold the camera firmly with the right hand. They should have been placed a bit more towards the front of the camera.

The front and rear dials are no longer made of plastic but of hard rubber. They have a better grip than their predecessors.

The Fn button activates a cursor on the rear display. With the joystick you can move it to one of the displayed settings and then use the front and rear wheel to change it. Or you press the joystick and get a full page to change the setting, with text explanations of the possible values.

Pressing the Fn button again brings you back to the same setting, so you can change it back and forth quite quickly. The DRIVE, WB, ISO and +/- buttons can be considered fixed shortcuts to these three settings, and the C button is a user-configurable shortcut. I think this user interface concept is an adequate replacement for the 7D's mix of buttons and dials, and you quickly get used to it.

Plugs

All cable sockets are now on the left side of the camera. On the 7D the USB socket was on the right side, in the memory card compartment. When shooting with the camera connected to a PC, the cable was always in the way. This is no longer the case with the A700. You can hold the camera firmly at the grip and still have the USB cable plugged in.

Build quality

The A700 is a sturdy camera. Everything is either metal or strong plastic. Nothing feels flimsy or easy to break. Its build quality is comparable to that of the 7. It's not up to the level of the 7D, which really was a tank, but it's also a bit lighter than the 7D.

The buttons, switches and plugs are officially weather-sealed, which is good. However, I have my doubts about the sealing of the card slot cover. It doesn't look like it can withstand much. On the other hand, I never had problems with the (officially unsealed) 7 and 7D, even in the rain, so I can't really complain.

There is an additional metal ring around the lens bayonet, which is part of the internal metal frame of the camera. Some say this is purely for optical reasons, others say this is the contact area for future weather-sealed lenses with an O-ring in the lens mount. We'll see that when new lenses are released in 2008.

Wireless remote release

The camera comes with a wireless infrared remote control, the RMT-DSLR1. It lets you release the camera with either no delay or with a 2 second delay, and you can control image playback with it. Unfortunately there are two significant restrictions:

  • The 2 second delay does not flip up the mirror before the delay (mirror pre-fire), so it is not the same as the 2 second delay that you can select as a drive option. Since operation with the remote control is another drive option, you also can't select both at the same time. When you want mirror pre-fire and not release on the camera, you still have to use your wired remote release. This restriction is completely unnecessary. The 2 second delay of the IR remote should always use mirror pre-fire.
  • The playback functions only work when the camera is connected to a TV. It sure wouldn't hurt if they always worked.

HDMI output

HDMI and USB socket
If you think about it, the only half-decent way to connect a DSLR with a TV is HDMI. It's digital (why convert a digital picture to analog and then back to digital) and high resolution (well, at least compared to old analog TV). The difference in playback quality is significant.

Unfortunately, the HDMI cable is not included in the package. The A700 requires a cable with the (smaller) B type plug on the camera end, and these cables are not as common as the cables that have A type plugs at both ends. I don't get it when makers omit a $5 item from the standard package and force customers to spend a lot of time and money to buy the item separately. Making a $1500 package $5 cheaper just doesn't make sense.

Of course, the A700 also has an analog video output.

Preset modes

On the 7D there were three preset modes, each of which could store many camera settings, and each had its own position on the big mode dial. By turning the dial to one of the preset mode positions, you could change all the stored settings at once. You can think of these as “make-your-own scene modes”.

The A700 also has three preset modes. The good thing is that they store more settings, especially the function of the C button. The bad thing is that the preset modes now have only a single position on the mode dial. You set the dial to MR (Memory Recall), and then you select one of the three stored modes with the joystick or front/rear dial and confirm. To store new settings, you change them, and then you go to the “Memory” option in the menu, select one of the three modes, and confirm. The 7D had a special M button for this. When you turn on the camera with the mode dial in the MR position, you get to select the preset mode and confirm. This, however, is easy, because you're offered the mode that was used last, and half-pressing the release confirms the selection. So you can just turn on the camera and shoot immediately if you're in a hurry.

The preset modes are only a little more complicated to use than on the 7D. Still I'd rather have three separate positions for them on the mode dial.

Performance

Autofocus

One problematic area of the 7D was its AF performance. It was slower than that of the film 7, and often it also had difficulties locking on the subject. The A700 brings AF performance back to the earlier level. It's faster, and it rarely has a problem to lock on the target. Even though the AF sensors of the A700 are one stop less sensitive than that of the 7D, the A700 is much more confident in low light conditions. That's one more proof that numbers in data sheets don't tell the full story.

The AF is now again supported by a built-in AF assist light. The 7D had to use the flash for that.

The layout of the AF sensors is different from that of the 7 and 7D. There are now 11 sensors instead of 9. 10 of them are line sensors, the center sensor is a double cross sensor. This center sensor is, in contrast to the 7 and 7D, no longer a normal cross sensor overlayed with a diagonal cross sensor. Instead, it's a combination of two vertical sensors and two horizontal sensors, forming a #. When a f/2.8 or faster lens is attached, it's overlayed by an additional horizontal line sensor for higher precision. None of the sensors is diagonal.

At first sight it looks like there no longer are dedicated corner sensors as on the 7 and 7D. But a closer look reveals that the leftmost and rightmost sensors are closer to the edge of the frame than the corner sensors of the 7/7D. The top and bottom sensors of the rows of three sensors are now at about the same position as the corner sensors of the 7/7D.

AF sensor layout compared
Konica Minolta 7DSony Alpha 700

Shooting performance

Right when pressing the release button for the first time, you hear that the A700 is in a different class than the 7D. The mirror action is both faster and softer. This allows for a maximum frame rate of 5 frames per second, and the softer mirror action surely contributed to the higher effectiveness of Super Steady Shot.

The camera buffer is large enough to shoot longer sequences with cRAW+JPEG (my preferred setting) before the frame rate has to slow down. With a fast card and JPEG only, you can shoot at 5 fps until the card is full.

Due to the camera's higher pixel number, both JPEGs and RAWs are bigger than those of the 7D. The new compressed cRAW format helps limiting the size of your raw data.

Sequence shot with 5 fps, ISO 800, AF-C, 80-200/2.8 HS-APO G

Image quality

Firmware Ver.2, 3 & 4
Sony has released Firmware Versions 2, 3 and 4 for the A700 in October and December 2007 and September 2008. You can download it here. Version 2 improves image quality (noise and sharpness) and flash exposure under certain conditions, version 3 removes two bugs, and version 4 adds a ±2 stop bracketing option and allows to switch off High ISO Noise reduction completely. My camera came with version 1 firmware. I have updated it to version 2, 3 and 4, and there were absolutely no problems during and after the update.

Most reviews I've seen and many forum discussions were concentrating on noise with high ISO settings. There were heated discussions about which cameras had better noise control at ISO 6400, if high ISO noise reduction is better or worse than with the competition, etc. This is all no issue for my style of shooting. If I remember correctly, I have done 1 (in words: one) real-life shot at ISO 1600 with the 7D, none at ISO 3200, a few at ISO 800, and probably 99% at ISO 200 and 100. I couldn't care less how good or bad the A700 is at ISO 6400, as long as it's excellent at ISO 100 and 200. And it is.

Adobe Camera Raw for A700
The A700 RAW file formats are supported by Adobe Camera Raw starting with version 4.2. Go to www.adobe.comto download the latest version.

In the following test shots, the image from the 7D has been scaled up to the size of the image from the A700. Both shots were taken with exactly the same setup, with the Minolta AF 100/2.8 Macro lens, on a tripod, manual focus, at f/8 and ISO 200, and the images were converted from the RAW files using Adobe Camera Raw 4.3 with default sharpening.

Newspaper test, 100/2.8 Macro
Konica Minolta 7D, upscaledSony Alpha 700, 100% crop

The image from the A700 clearly shows more details.

But remember that you can not see the difference with all lenses. When the lens is the limiting factor, the higher pixel number of the A700 will not result in a higher resolution. This is illustrated by the following shots, taken with the Konica Minolta DT 18-70/3.5-5.6 at 70 mm (the weak end of this lens):

Newspaper test, DT 18-70/3.5-5.6
Konica Minolta 7D, upscaledSony Alpha 700, 100% crop

In this example, the upscaled 7D shot looks just like the A700 shot. There's not more detail despite the higher resolution sensor. So unless you also have the lenses, don't expect better results from the A700 than from the 7D.

Exposure metering

Exposure metering is nearly perfect, as it was on its predecessors. I've seen reviews that criticized metering as inconsistent. I have not seen this. In controlled conditions I've seen exposure variations of about 1/6 stop or less. This is very little, and in real life shots you will probably not notice this at all. It is far from being “wrong” or “inconsistent”.

The 7D had the occasional problem that, while total exposure was OK, the red channel was overexposed and clipped. You had to pay special attention to this problem and adjust exposure if necessary. The A700 helps avoiding this problem in two ways. First, it shows the histogram with separate color channels, making it more obvious when one channel is clipped. Second, the exposure metering and color conversion algorithms seem to be better adjusted to avoid the problem.

Flash

Flash exposure metering was one of the big problems of the 7D. You could have long series of perfect flash exposure, and then suddenly shots that were severely underexposed or overexposed for no apparent reason. This has changed with the A700. Using the same flash unit, of course, flash exposure is always good, with the flash mounted on the camera or triggered wirelessly.

The camera's x-sync speed was increased to 1/250 second (1/200 second when using Super Steady Shot). This gives you more room to work until you have to resort to HSS.

The delay between the metering pre-flash and the main flash is said to be reduced. I was not able to test this, and actually I didn't find it to be a problem with the 7D, either.

The built-in flash rises not as high above the lens axis compared to the 7D. It's about 5 mm closer to the lens axis, slightly increasing the danger for red eyes.

Red-eye reduction is now a separate menu item and can not be enabled or disabled by switching flash modes with the Fn button. Even worse, red-eye reduction is in Custom Menu 3, and the other flash modes are in Recording Menu 2, five menu pages apart! Having separate settings would make sense if you could combine red-eye reduction with the other modes, but you can't. It works only when the flash mode is set to fill-flash. Sony should definately change this!

Rear display

The new rear display is just great. It has a high VGA (640×480) resolution, large area (3"), good contrast, and glare is reduced greatly. Onlike on the 7D, it has a built-in hard cover instead of a clipped-on, soon-to-be-lost cover.

Did I already say that the display is great?

Vertical grip VG-C70AM

VG-C70AM controls
The VG-C70AM truly matches the A700 in quality, which wasn't the case with the VC-7D and the 7D. The grip is metal and solid plastic and rubber, the ergonomics are that of the camera, the buttons and dials are of the same quality as those on the camera. The buttons and battery cover are weather-sealed. There's even a joystick on the grip now.

The two batteries now are oriented along the grip, which makes the grip not as fat as the VC-7D. The latter was a bit too fat for my hands, the VG-C70AM is a perfect fit. The new grip also can no longer use AA batteries (which, in my opinion, is no loss), and that certainly helped improving the ergonomics.

You can have one or two batteries in the grip. They are no longer used in parallel, so you don't have to be careful that they have the same charge. Instead, the camera first uses one battery, and when it's empty, the camera switches to the other battery if present. The charge of both batteries is shown on the camera display.

Nothing is perfect, however, and I have two problems with the grip:

  • Again, Sony chose a design that requires to remove the battery from the body when attaching the grip. Please, Sony, have a second look at the VC-7 or VC-9. This is how it should be designed!
    Left side of VG-C70AM, why no eyelet?
  • There's no longer a strap eyelet at the left side of the grip, even though there would have been room for it. When I was using the VC-7 and VC-7D with a strap, I was always attaching it to the left camera eyelet and the left grip eyelet. So with horizontal shots, the strap was hanging down at the left side of the camera, and with vertical shots it was hanging down from the bottom. In other words, it was always nicely out of the way. Now that I have to use the camera eyelets, the strap has a tendency to hang over the viewfinder when holding the camera vertically.

Still, I consider the VG-C70AM a must. The camera handles better even when you hold it horizontally, because the palm and little finger has a place to rest on. Without the grip, both dangle below the camera (although not as much as with the 7D), or you have to hold the camera more with the fingertips than with the full fingers. Needless to say, holding the camera vertically with the grip is a joy.

Possible improvements

Sony should consider the following improvements which all can be implemented with a firmware update:

  • Automatic storage switch-over: When one of the two cards is full, the camera should automatically use the other card if present.
  • The 2-second delay when using the IR remote control should include mirror pre-fire. Currently you can not have MLU when you release with the IR remote.
  • Bigger steps for bracketing options, useful when doing DRO photography. Note: This had been added with firmware v4.
  • A camera number shall be configurable and be part of the image file names. If you have more than one A700 and configure them with different numbers, they will not generate files with identical names.
  • Default IPTC data (e.g. name of author, copyright phrase, etc.) shall be configurable and embedded in the EXIF data of each image file.
  • There shall be more options for the lens button, e. g.
    • DOF preview (currently implemented)
    • AF stop (currently implemented)
    • Temporary exposure bracketing
    • Temporary continuous advance
    • Dynamic AF control (AF stop when in AF-C mode, temporary AF-C when in AF-A or AF-S mode)
  • The lens button function shall be in the set of parameters stored in preset modes.
  • The flash zoom reflector shall be set according to the narrower angle of view of the A700, not the original angle of view of full frame cameras. This would get you a slightly higher guide number from your flash (you can never have too much). Note: This is now implemented in the new flashes HVL-F42AM and HVL-F58AM.
  • Custom white balance should be accessible more quickly. For example, when you have set your camera to custom white balance, a long press of the WB button shall immediately go to “set” mode, take the shot, and store the result in the current register. The current sequence is press WB, dial to “set”, press joystick, press release, confirm with joystick. The alternative sequence would be just a long press of WB.
  • Support for DNG format image files. Come on, how hard can it be?
  • Activating DOF preview shall also activate the stroboscopic flash or focus light of a mounted macro flash.
  • The initial zoom factor shall be configurable.
  • Clean up the mess with the flash setup. Red-eye reduction shall be available as another flash mode, as on the 7D. Don't hide it in the menu, five pages away from the other flash settings!

Conclusion

The Sony A700 is a worthy successor to the Konica Minolta 7D. All shooting parameters are now back to the level of the Minolta 7, and some exceeding it. It's an improvement over the 7D in almost every respect.

As with any technical product, there are a few minor nit-picks, but I don't find any significant flaw with the camera.

More sample shots

This knocker is hanging on the door of the Bamberg State Library. I shot it with the 17-35/3.5 G at 35 mm at ISO 200 with overcast white balance.
This is another shot of a black-headed gull in flight (cropped). The AF of the A700 can keep up with these fast-flying gulls zipping by, and the 12 MP resolution gives you room to crop the resulting images a bit. Shot at ISO 800 with the 80-200/2.8 HS-APO G and AF-C.

Links


Readers' comments

There are 28 comment(s):
#1: Comment posted by Gustav Jensen on January 11, 2008 - 11:38:59 AM:
OMG, this is the best review of the A700 I have ever seen!!
I already own a A700, but reading this article was interesting. I agree 100% with what you say even though I've never owned a 7 or 7D (only 5D).
I do use high ISO more than you do, and I am very impressed with the result compared to the 5D.
Thanks for the article and lets hope Sony reads it too and fix the the minor problems in a firmware or later model
Best Regards
Gustav Jensen
#2: Comment posted by Alex Martins on January 13, 2008 - 10:07:26 PM:
I read that RAW files already have noise reduction applied to them, this in effect means that the photographer can't treat RAW as the 'digital negative'. This subsequently removes the ability to successfully apply any third party noise reduction method (either now or in the future) or to make his or her own decisions about the balance between noise and NR.
I'll like to hear from you about this matter.
Best regards
Alex.
Michael Hohner answers:
As indicated in my review, I'm not a high ISO shooter, so the high-ISO NR of the A700 doesn't affect me much. That said, here are my views on the topic:
- It's true that there is no "off" setting for high-ISO NR.
- It seems that the RAW converters also play a major role with this issue, and obviously Adobe Camera Raw 4.3 does not convert these high-ISO shots as well as others do. So this may be more of a RAW converter issue. Also see http://photoclubalpha.com/2007/12/23/acr-431-hasnt-solved-a700-high-iso-mush-problems/
- People are asking for an "off" setting without knowing what they would get. I'm sure Sony has experimented with this in development, and I'm also sure there's a good reason why there's no "off" setting.
- I have the impression that the discussion is way out of proportion compared to the actual problem. I doubt we'd see the same if Sony had simply named the three levels "off", "low" and "high" instead of "low", "medium", and "high".
#3: Comment posted by Malcolm Ruddiforth on January 26, 2008 - 12:53:42 PM:
Just to say thank you. Have just bought a A700 and you have given me much, much, encouragement.
Small query which may not be in your area of knowledge.
My A700 has been shipped into UK from USA (I think). It is V1.
Wishing to upgrade the firmware to V3 I see there are 2 different downloads. One for UK and Europe and one for USA. I am supposing I should use the USA download but wonder what the difference is? Any idea?
Cheers.
Michael Hohner answers:
Last time I checked the firmware updates from the US server and the European server were identical.
#4: Comment posted by Matthew on February 07, 2008 - 06:44:28 AM:
As a 7D/A100/A700 Owner, (I recently sold the dissapointing A100 to a friend) I enjoyed this article. As a college student, I chose these Sonolta cameras for the feature/value ratio. I used the kit lens and an old Quataray 70-300 for 2 years. The kit lens demonstration was especially helpful. Only recently have I started to collect fast (1.7,2.8) Prime lenses and I have yet to do that test.

While the 7D can't touch the IQ/DRO/Color of the A700, there are several physical features that I do miss. I miss the time-lapse...and that is one of the reasons I've kept the 7D. Also...I miss the flash compensation on the dial of the 7D. I used that dial when I knew I was too close to the subject...or just wanted less "blue" flash. (Yes...I set the Custom button to Exp. Comp, but sometimes I still miss the dial) The grip on the 7D was smaller, allowing more of a closed hand when holding it. That little bit of extra curl helped to hold the camera one-handed while your thumb wandered to various buttons.

Have you noticed that the Remote Camera Control is missing the preview function? There is no easy way to get it to work as smootly as the 7D's software.

HIGH ISO: I AM a high ISO Shooter...I picked the 7D mainly because it offered ISO3200 for the money. For concert shots, gymnasiums, and moving people with the kit lens, you can't beat High ISO shooting. The A700's high ISO Shots are extremely handy, and very usable/enlargable up to about 4000. ISO 6400 has gotten me sharp shots I could never get before without a disruptive flash....I can filter the grain in post-processing...but a blurry subject tends to stay blurry. I do have to say that chromatic grain (which all of these cameras do exhibit) is much more annyoing that the luminance grain of the high-end Nikons. Unlike the A100, Color saturation is consistent across all ISOs. Eye Start is handy for sports photography, where that split second may make the difference, and the grip sensor is a battery-saver when you carry it (turned on) over your shoulder. Lord knows you need to conserve power with that 3" screen (100 less photos per charge than the 7D and A100.)

Oh, The A700's screen is so perfect that I almost never have to check those histograms...this is the first camera I've had that I truly trust the screen for sharpness and exposure.

One last bit...accessories.
Yeah, the limitations of the remote annoy me, but I got a $10 compatible wired one online...and no more problems.
How did you manage to lose your 7D's (free) screen protector? Mine has NEVER fallen off. I bought the A700 protector from Sony specifically to get rid of the constant nose/finger-smudges on the anti-glare screen, but also to protect it from unseen dangers in my bag or elsewhere. It's very much like buying a $10 UV filter to protect that $500 lens...why wouldn't you?

IMHO, My images have greatly increased in quality and detail between the 7D and the A700, though I think the 7D is slightly more superior in ergonomics. As long as both cameras continue to work (both still under warranty and enjoying the newest firmwares), I will continue to carry them both in my camera bag.

That's my 2 cents...or maybe $1.75 ~Matthew
Michael Hohner answers:
Remote Camera Control can be set up to display recorded images immediately. A true preview (not review) isn't possible with either software or camera.
#5: Comment posted by Tom on February 13, 2008 - 04:20:13 PM:
Firmware improved this “yellow” channel issue in close ranges, but settings always need to be boosted to “vivid +3 contrast -3 sharpness -3. I would like to see a future firmware which gives additional control over the color pallet. take the red channel - by the time you get bold colors, they are very bold with a higher contrast which tends to bring out all the imperfections in a photo - especially indoors (different lighting) incades + flourecent. Bring down the Vivid settings - you are back to washed out. Now other camera mfg’s tend to create a positive moire’ whereas the color channels blend sweetly to create an airbrushed affect. Sony seems to do this under the white channel. I have read that the meter was created under conditions of studio lighting. I would like to see a firmware upgrade that teaches the meter to take Flourecent AWB and push it to 2700 M5 or so. It meters here too much in the Green channel. Don’t get me wrong here - I am able to get some excellent pics out of the camera. but it takes some tweaking and test shots under different situations. I normally can’t just shoot. I shoot I look I shoot I look - I adjust in Photoshop. Seems like the camera needs some recalibration under everyday lighting situations. I think this is a huge oversite by sony. If you want to play with the big boys you need to correct this issue. I love the camera ergonomics, features and built in stabilization. I am writing this becasuse I want to make this camera a winner on discriminating eyes.
so:
point 1 - Correct the AWB meter under Incadecent + flourecent lighting - push towards Magenta channel instead of Green
point 2 - all metering - make “pink” shade of magenta more prominent instead of the Greenish Yellow hue.
point 3 - Less contrast/sharpness to create positive moire’
point 4 - allow for more vivid color boosting with point 3
point 5 - allow a user to adjust these settings globally ~ for the camera so it is always shot in these modes - it drives me crazy that every time I power off the camera my settings reset. uhg! ! !
If you corrected the above through another update you would have a REAL winner here. Again ergonomics, the menu, and all the features are excellent ~ the calibration of the meter seems off unless your in sunlight / shade conditions, flash and indoors the meter is just off balance. It takes tweaking and tweaking to get it close and sometimes the color still is not “pretty” - once you reach optimum color - it is slightly too harsh. Sorry Sony. But please review this as I really really want to love this camera!
Michael Hohner answers:
My comments:

1. WB with flourescent light is always very difficult for any camera because of the discontinuous spectrum of these. I'd never expect any AWB to be perfect for flourescent light (or, in fact, for any light).
2. The camera resets your settings only when you use full auto mode. Move beyond that mode and use at least P mode. Then the camera will keep your settings.
3. Don't know what you mean with "positive moire".
#6: Comment posted by Tony Keller on March 05, 2008 - 03:41:43 PM:
My question is:

I am not sure if the ability to create a double exposure within the camera is there or has been over looked by Sony? I am surprised this creative function does not appear in the manual. If there is a way to accomplish this within the camera I would appreciate learning about it.
Michael Hohner answers:
No Minolta or Sony DSLR offers a multiple exposure mode. I also don't know any other DSLR that offers it. This is because you can do it with much more control in post-processing on a PC.
#7: Comment posted by Tony Keller on March 05, 2008 - 05:15:37 PM:
Double exposures can be done on several models of Nikons product line D200, D300, and D1, D2 and D3. Fuji S3 also has the ability. I realize this can be done in photoshop, but again so can many other features like filters, WB. You see I am a dyed in the wool Minolta user, still cherish my Maxxum 9 and KM 7d. At this point I have to much invested in glass to change now. So than goodness for Sony's breathing life into a great system of cameras and lenses. I really enjoy my a700, I only hope to see Sony incorporate some "in" camera editing features as Nikon has do. After all the a700 has been directly compared to the d300. And now with the new full frame on the horizon what's next.
Michael Hohner answers:
I don't remember ever using multiple exposures, even with film cameras, where you don't have an alternative. Even if the A700 had this feature, I guess I would still do it on the PC. This is really a non-issue for me.
#8: Comment posted by Tony Keller on March 05, 2008 - 09:25:33 PM:
I understand that it is not a mode used by many photographers, if ever. But in the world of fine art photography there are several highly creative individuals that use this function on a regular basis. Plus for some people they prefer to spending their creative time behind a camera not a PC.
Michael Hohner answers:
You might have noticed that this review does not care much about what others may or may not need or what Sony should do or not do to please someone else. :-)
#9: Comment posted by Tony Keller on March 06, 2008 - 03:37:47 PM:
I would like to apologize if I went outside the limits of the reviews review. My interest was simply to find out if the camera could be manipulated in manner to provide double exposures or multiple exposures. It was you who summarily dismissing the need for the function by stating " No Minolta or Sony DSLR offers a multiple exposure mode." Followed by "I also don't know any other DSLR that offers it. " By the way I could of gone on with the number of manufactures and models of DSLR cameras that offer this feature, but I felt I made my point.

But after reading your next response, this is were your comments really become interesting, which was " I don't remember ever using multiple exposures, even with film cameras, where you don't have an alternative"." Even if the A700 had this feature, I guess I would still do it on the PC"." This is really a non-issue for me". You had already pontificated in your prior comment with " This is because you can do it with much more control in post-processing on a PC". How would you know that? You already said you have never done one, wow pretty narrow minded. By the way don't tell these truly great photographers (Artist) like Tony Sweet, Bruce Dale, Jim Brandenburg or Bob Krist that double or multiple exposures are a "non issue". There are workshops conducted on the subject.

It would have been far simpler for you to say the function is not available, than to use your bully pulpit to defend your lack of knowledge. My interest in images is peaked when a photographer takes a photograph and I have to ask myself "how did they do that," not when I see a basic macro picture of a flower or a bug and ask myself " why did he do that." It was last week I was photographing some orchids, when I same across a very, very elderly gentleman (I know he was very very, beacuse I am elderly) that was doing just that, multiple exposing the flowers on his Nikon, they were absolutely amazing, plus doing some tricks with the lens, that would be to complicated to report for this review. It rekindled my interest in the function.

But like they say "ignorance is bliss".

Rest assured, in regards to this review, I share your same lack of interest in your lack of interest.

I am sure you won't post this response, but I had to comment. The Internet is a wonderful thing, everyone can have a platform, even the uninformed.
Michael Hohner answers:
I'm a bit surprised by the aggressiveness in your comments. When I said that "No Minolta or Sony DSLR offers a multiple exposure mode" I was simply stating a fact. I still stand by my opinion that doing "double exposure" on the PC is more flexible. You can balance individual shots freely, you can move individual shots around freely, you can combine non-cropped and cropped shots, you have a really big screen, you can touch up the seams, etc. And if your software doesn't support what you need, you can simply switch to a different software. Duplicating this all on the camera is, in my opinion, a waste of effort.

I do not say that nobody needs or wants it. I only say that I don't need or want it, at least not in a DSLR. The entire review is about what I think about the camera. It's subjective. I think nobody can write a truly objective review, so I'm not even trying. I do not want to explore the thousand facets of everyone elses needs or wants and balance the camera's capabilities against these. Please accept that.

And, please, just because I have little interest in one feature doesn't make me uninformed. I, just like you, have preferences, and assuming these are only based on ignorance is quite rude.

If you absolutely need or want double exposure on a DSLR, then don't buy the A700. I don't want to dictate your needs, so please do not dictate mine.
#10: Comment posted by Tony Keller on March 08, 2008 - 04:59:24 AM:
Please, enough is enough. I only asked one question, period. "I give up, uncle." You seem to have an unquenchable desire to be right. I repeat , I was only looking for an answer to a question, not expecting to be ambushed but someone lying in the weeds looking to prove they are the all knowing, preeminent authority on the subject of the Sony DSLR. I don't want to go down this road again, I have seen this movie. I get it, this is a function not available on my a700. Thank you.

I will leave you with the last word. So go ahead, I promise I will not respond to your answer. But I do have one last question. In your quote within your quote, you stated " When I said that "No Minolta or Sony DSLR offers a multiple exposure mode" I was simply stating a fact."
Michael, I am confused. Are you saying that "Minolta" did not offer that feature? Sir, they certainly did. Or if you are inferring there was a "Minolta DSLR model" that did not have that feature? To my knowledge there was know such product. If there was, I am unfamiliar it. What model "MINOLTA DSLR" was it? I am confused with your " stating a fact".
Are you talking about Konica, or just Minolta, but then again you did not mention Konica did you. Maybe, they (Konica) forgot to carry it ( DE ,multiple image,overlap exposure) over during the merger, so it never ended up on the check list of either Konica's or Sony's R and D for the new models. Maybe it was lost it in "Mind of Minolta" Thanks.

None of this moves or enhances the enjoyment of our wonderful expression of photography forward, for which I sincerely apologize to the readers for this enormous waste of time and trite thoughts. I am only looking to expand my own personal creativity within photography. Limited and bound by only myself and the equipment I have. But then again Michael is not interests in the need of an individual as stated previously, are you Michael. So good luck to the group.

PS: I still love my a700

Michael Hohner answers:
You seem to be a very confused person. You asked a question, I gave the answer. Now you're enraged that I pretend to be all-knowing, in your opinion. What is it that you want?

Just to get the facts straight, here's the answer again: "No Minolta, KonicaMinolta or Sony DSLR offers a multiple exposure mode."

Note that I said "DLSR", not "SLR", as in my first answer. Now before you come back to vent some more, please first check the facts.
#11: Comment posted by M Ruddiforth on March 18, 2008 - 10:47:17 AM:
I would like to use my A700 for High Dynamic Range (HDR) pictures which is best at -2.0, 0 and +2.0 EV bracket shots. Disappointing that the EV bracketing only goes to 0.7 EV. Yes it can be done on a tripod but light shifts quickly during camera adjustment. Have asked Sony as I guess the solution would be in a piece of firmware but I am not optimistic. I think Mr Hohner refered to this in his excellent review but I want to give it a bit of emphasis.
Michael Hohner answers:
Even with larger bracketing steps it's a good idea to use a tripod, anyway. May make matching individual shots easier and more precise.
#12: Comment posted by R.Mendis on May 27, 2008 - 02:04:32 PM:
Eye start auto focus and the grip sensor are useful especially when using slow focusing lenses like the Tamron 200-500mm.
#13: Comment posted by W4yne on June 03, 2008 - 08:55:13 AM:
Love this complex review with tons of information you wouldn't get anywhere else (not even in a photo magazine)
what do you think about sony in general? with the A900 in the wake.
Im referring to your essay about the future of "DSLRs" with the few physical informations on the sensor of the a900 ...
I'd rather buy the a900 if it had a full frame 12 or 14 megapixel sensor than the 24.6 one that sony develops
thats a thing i noticed all over the about sony.. they try to do too much at once (in terms of catching up to the nikon and canon highend cameras)
I just bought the a100 but im already thinking about either buying a better sony one later or keeping myself from spending on extra gadgets (only bought a fast standart lens so far) to switch to nikon/canon later
jim
Michael Hohner answers:
I think Sony is doing mostly the right thing with the A900 (or at least, not the wrong thing). If it had "only" 12 to 14 MP, everybody would complain that it's not more than the Nikon D3. Sony can only gain market share if their products set them apart from the competition. They can't gain from releasing a Sony version of the D3 half a year later. Are they aiming too high? We'll know that after they've released it.
#14: Comment posted by Armin R on June 08, 2008 - 06:50:00 AM:
Tanks to Michael for the excellent review!! I share the view of M Ruddiforth about HDR. It is a true petty that Sony did not consider the need for bigger bracket steps for HDR photography. Would be an easy to fix software matter. (please, please, please do it!!!)
Even though I rarely use the Auto Mode I still would like to criticise the fact, that the A700 will only go down to ISO 200 (not 100) if operated in this mode - hard to imagine what they were thinking when they did that.
Michael Hohner answers:
Maybe they chose ISO 200 because this is the sensor's base ISO. At ISO 100 you will lose some dynamic range.
#15: Comment posted by Armin R on June 22, 2008 - 02:45:09 PM:
I dint know the sensor was ISO 200 based - do you advise to work using ISO 200 rather then ISO 100? cheers!
Michael Hohner answers:
At ISO 100 you get the lowest noise, and at ISO 200 you get the highest dynamic range.
#16: Comment posted by George Givens on July 17, 2008 - 06:11:19 AM:
Hi Michael,

I'd like to say thank you for your thorough review of the A700. I already own the A700. I know it defies explanation but your comparison to 7D has helped me to appreciate the A700 as a camera in its own right. I am a dyed in the wool Minolta/Konica-Minolta and now Sony SLR/DSLR owner. I own a 700si, HtsiPlus, Maxxum 9, KM7D and now A700. I absolutely love my Maxxum 9. I do not knock owners of other camera brands, some of my best friends are Nikon and Canon (maybe not so much Canon vbg) owners. I say each to their own. I am 57 and long ago on the advice of my photography instructor, I chose Minolta as my SLR based on how the camera felt in my hand and on the logistical ergonomics of the controls not based on the features. The only requirement my instructor gave me was that the camera must be able to be controlled manually. Before my first SLR I only owned TLRs, point shoots, and inexpensive 35mm cameras. Anyway, I digress.

Besides complimenting you on this review I wanted to say I agree with your assessment of the VG-C70AM especially about the strap. I absolutely loved the VC-7D and VC-9 grips and straps. Also I don’t understand why Sony charges so much for the VG-C70AM. I didn't pay near that much for the VC-7D and VC-9. Also, I find the VG-C70AM slightly less comfortable than the VC-7D and VC-9. I have given this some thought and think it is because the VC-7D and VC-9 grips and their respective cameras have longer or wider (depending on your orientational view) bases than the A700. Like you I really liked that I didn't have to remove the battery from the Maxxum 9 to install the VC-9 and wished that Sony had returned to that style of VG. I hope with the forth coming flagship Sony goes back to that style.

Finally, I'd like to ask your opinion about the sharpness of the A700. I don't know if it is my imagination but I don't think the images are quite as sharp as they should be. I have downloaded all firmware updates and even sent the camera to the shop to be looked at. I don't know if they found anything wrong because in the explanation of repairs section all it says is
"Reconnected Focus Flex
Auto focus test, Check, Recalibration and realignment
Software download, test check and complete recalibration
General test, Check, Clean and Repair all functions and systems"
I have compared the images taken with my 7D and A700 using the same lenses (e.g. Tamron SP AF Aspherical XR Di LD IF 28-75mm 2.8 Macro), ISO settings, F-stops, and shutter speeds and think the 7D images are sharper. Could it just be my imagination?
Michael Hohner answers:
As I have written in the review above, you can get more detail out of the A700 than out of the 7D if you use the right lens. Maybe in your case the lens is the limiting factor. You also have to upscale the lower-resolution 7D images to the higher resolution of the A700 to make valid comparisons.
#17: Comment posted by George Givens on July 18, 2008 - 04:30:21 AM:
Michael,

Please define "right lens". Not to put you on the spot but are you saying that the Tamron SP AF Aspherical XR Di LD IF 28-75mm 2.8 Macro is not a sharp lens? Do you think a lens can be sharp without being a G series lens? I under the concept of upscaling an image but I fail to understand why in order to compare the sharpness of one image to sharpness of another I need to upscale the image made with a 6MP sensor to match that of the image of the 12MP image. I am not trying to challenge your assertion but I don't understand the logic. After all, when lenses are compared for sharpness I don't believe sensor resolution is taken into account. By that logic if I down size the resolution of the A700 to match the 7D resolution, than all other things being equal such as technique and using the same lens, (regardless of the quality) of the lens the A700 image should be sharper, right? In other words wouldn't logic dictate that if the same lens is used on camera A and camera B and both cameras have the same ISO film and same exposure that the images should have identical sharpness?
Michael Hohner answers:
With "right lens" I mean one that has enough resolution so it is not the limiting factor in the comparison, i. e. you are really testing the cameras, not the lens. Just again, look at the above example. I've used the 100/2.8 Macro, a very high resolution lens, and still you can just so see the difference. I don't have personal experience with the Tamron, but I doubt that it outresolves the macro.

Just to be able to make a meaningful visual comparison, you have to bring the two images to the same size. If you down-scale the higher resolution image, you eliminate all the additional detail that may be in the high-res image. That's also why even pictures from low-end cameras look good when you scale them down to web size. So down-scaling is not an option.

This means that you have to up-scale the lower resolution image.

An important factor here is the software that does the scaling. Simpler, faster algorithms usually do not result in the same quality compared to complexer, but probably slower, algorithms.

And to make things ultimately more complicated, you have to make a difference between resolution and sharpness. Resolution is the ability to render fine details in the image, and sharpness is mainly edge contrast. The former is determined and limited by the lens and sensor, and it can not be increased later. Details that are not in the image when it is taken can not be added in image processing (even when Hollywood suggests it can). You only can increase edge contrast in image processing, and that's what software does when you use a "sharpening" function. This is also what's influenced by the in-camera "sharpness" setting. So when you compare two cameras, you also have to make sure to use equivalent sharpening settings, either in your RAW converter or in the camera. "Equivalent" here is not necessarily "same setting value". Two cameras, both at their default setting, may apply a different level of sharpening.
#18: Comment posted by Adrian Hoskins on July 20, 2008 - 12:54:47 AM:
I've owned Minolta D7, Sony a100, and recently upgraded to a700 which I'm running on firmware version 3.

The a700 has superb ergonomics, great images and feels very solid compared with the awkward and toy-like a100. Image quality at ISO 100 is incredible, superb at ISO 200, and good enough for all but the biggest enlargements at ISO 400 and 800. Even at 1600 the images are very sharp and beautifully coloured, with noise only excessive in out of focus areas, and there it can easily be removed with an image editor.

The viewfinder is gorgeous but not quite as vast as that on the D7. The LCD and menus are excellent. I've used Canon 40D and Nikon D300 owned by friends - the a700 equals or betters them in image quality, and for me personally has a nicer and more intuitive feel.

Only a couple of criticisms - Flash metering ( with latest ADI-equipped Sigma 105 macro lens ) still a bit hit and miss, just as it was with the D7, Seems best if exposure mode set to M, and flash set to ADI but still inconsistent.

The other criticism is that you can't switch instantly between single-shot and auto-bracket exposures. You have to play about with the menus. Why can't we have a toggle switch ( like the AF/M button ) to switch between single shot and bracket ? It's a very common situation - you might be shooting a whole load of shots of an "average" subject using single shot, and then along comes something unusual and you want to very quickly shoot a bracketed set, but by the time you've found your way through the menus and changed to continuous bracket, the subject has gone.
#19: Comment posted by Martin Reid on July 27, 2008 - 08:19:53 PM:
May I commend Mike Hohner on this web site. How nice to disocver one is not alone in the Minolta/Sony world! I have been a Minolta user since the first Maxxums, still have my 9 and now a a700 which my store (Henrys) kindly provided for free when my 7D started to malfunction (messed up flash & black images & Sony could not repair). In general I am impressed with the Sony a700, its faster & sharper than the 7D, good build etc. I am appreciative that Sony stayed with the Minolta concept of putting most key adjustables on the body & not the menus. Must admit I still have some difficuilty with the "multi-selector" guess I have a clumsy finger!

I appreciate Mike's subjective review after all objectives are a dime a dozen!

I think deciding whether to stay with the a700 or move up to the a900 will be a hard choice. In a sense having had the 9000 then the 9 SLRs suggests one should go for a900. However the film cameras had a technological life of 10 years and that is not true in the digital world. The a900 will likely cost somewhere in the $3-5,000 range and that is hard to take if the a901 is out 2 years later with a couple of killer features! I like the notion of full frame & a viewfinder that will likely return to 100% view and have the totally solid feel of the Maxxum 9. But can I afford a $2,000+ upgrade!? The a700 has most of what it takes to be a great camera and the a701 will cost a lot less net of trade than the foregoing scenario! Now if I can just remein calm cool and logical when the a900 hits the street!!

I saw a previous post about a multiple exposure feature. This was on the Maxxum 9. I asumed it was little more than a film advance gear release feature. That would probably be much more tircky in the digital world.
#20: Comment posted by Param Tomanec on July 30, 2008 - 04:52:13 PM:
Hello All,

Michael, thank you for the informative and objective review. First I thought to wait for the expected A900, after reading your review however I went to store today to check out the A700.

The reason for that is the function you mention INTERVALOMETER. I looked carefully into the manual in the store and also on the camera menus and settings. I have to report that I could not find this. Would you please tell me where is the function located. I am interested in its possibilites.

Many thanks.

Kind regards,
Param
Michael Hohner answers:
As I've written, the A700 does not have an intervalometer function.
#21: Comment posted by Param on August 08, 2008 - 12:15:24 AM:
Of course, I have over looked that... wishful thinking on my side. :)

Thanks again and all the best.
#22: Comment posted by jpr on August 09, 2008 - 05:51:35 PM:
Another annoying wireless remote restriction is that it only works from in front of the camera. Another reason to use the wired remote instead.
-jpr
#23: Comment posted by Patrick Ip on February 22, 2009 - 04:38:26 AM:
Thanks for an excellent write-up. I also own both a 7D and the A700. One thing I really missed on the A700 is the lock on the mode dial. I found that the dial is too easy to move out of the selected position and several times I missed some critical shots because the dial was set to Manual when I was not expecting.
#24: Comment posted by LRS on April 24, 2009 - 01:37:07 AM:
You can pick up very effective and cheap compatible wireless remote units from Amazon for around €25 - €45.
Thanks for all the information Michael. I was searching for flash socket details for an electronic project which brought me to this site. I own a Sony 200 and the articles here have provoked food for thought. Your ideas on improving the WB setup are very sensible as I quite often grab and shoot. It would also help those who need spectacles to read the menu items!!
#25: Comment posted by Jacques Smit on May 09, 2009 - 09:55:37 AM:
Hi Micheal thanks for the excellent comments etc. I'm in South Africa and here its Canon or Nikon world. My first camera was the 505Si Minolta and with that one I was very impressed with the quality. Two years ago a bought the A100 and 2 months ago I switch to the A 700. At this stage I got the 18 - 70mm sony lense and a 70 - 300mm Sigma lens. Want to buy more lenses. What would you say? Must I go for more sigma lenses or the Sony lenses? I mostly shoot portfolios and weddings. What lenses would you prefer. You could sent the email to my email adress also.
#26: Comment posted by Aavo Raig on June 06, 2009 - 08:17:25 AM:
Dear Michael, thank you for reveiws and knowledge you share on your website.There is so much about Minolta-Sony products, that can't be discovered in Estonia. Estonia is Canon-Nikon-Pentax country. I am happy with my A700 and before it with KM 5D I have used. The main reason to by KM 5D was in 2006 in-camera stabilisation. I use lot ISO400-1600 (Ver.4 ISO1600 is ok! for technical photo) for my job (planning, design, supervision)and hobies, especially for badminton. I am using ZA 16-88/3,5-4,5 and Sony 50/1,4 lenses. These lenses are very good for me. I have no lenses from former period to use with my A700(Soviet Zenit, GDR Praktika,Canon A-1). I had never owned macro-lense and the croping in PC is not seccesfull despite to high number of pixels.

Can you suggest some macro-lenses from your experience for A700 owner, who is not 100% entusiast, but likes to have just one lense with sharp centre for macro-pfotos? Whay I am asking this? I can't compare Sony and Minolta lenses, if so, in Estonia. Minolta lenses are not here!
Michael Hohner answers:
The 100 mm Macros from Minolta and Sony (see lens table) are probably the most universal macros. There are also comparable lenses from Tamron and Sigma.
#27: Comment posted by R on November 11, 2009 - 12:49:54 PM:
7D has no "built-in" intervalometer at all. You can buy -external- one (optional) as Canon TC-803N
Michael Hohner answers:
The Konica Minolta 7D does have an intervalometer, see page 78 of the manual.
#28: Comment posted by Alex Frazier on December 09, 2009 - 06:12:52 AM:
I frequently shoot at ISO 1600 when doing weddings. I don't personally care for the look of flat lighting, and shooting straight without a flash (when possible) allows for more effective feature modeling. To speak to the reviews on the high ISO noise problem, let me say that the noise is only a problem if you underexpose, because the noise creeps up when you try to increase the exposure. If you are overexposed, noise is not an issue.

I can also say that I have myself run into a good deal of lens hunting during auto focus in low light situations. To be more specific, in lighting situations that were barely dim, I have had some problems. I find that I have to focus manually much more often than I care to.

Apart from those things, I agree with you completely. And to add to the list of must haves, Sony needs to accommodate a means to shoot multiple exposures apart from "Bulb." I have a 25 year old Mamiya 645, and IT has multiple exposure capability. You'd think that with all our modern digital technology, the least they could do is provide an option for it.

Share/Bookmark