Sony announces six new lenses at PMA 2009

March 03, 2009 - 10:15:18 AM:

Sony today has announced six new lenses at PMA 2009. (read the full announcement here)

Six new Sony Alpha lenses

The new lenses are (left to right):

  1. Super Telephoto Lens
  2. DT 50/1.8
  3. DT 30/2.8 Macro
  4. DT 18-55/3.5-5.6
  5. DT 55-200/4-5.6
  6. 28-75/2.8

This announcement surely surprised a few people, and it proves once again that you should not listen too much to Internet rumors. Most of them were not only wrong, but were seriously far away.

Here are my comments to these lenses:

  1. Sony still has not issued any specifications for this lens. This means that there will still be some time before this lens actually hits the market. What we can see, however, is that the lens has changed significantly from the mock-up that was shown at PMA 2007. This is no surprise. The 70-400, when it was released, also looked very different compared to the mock-up, and I would not be surprised if the remaining lenses from the PMA 2007 lineup also changed a lot when they will finally appear as a product.
    Unfortunately Sony seems to continue with silver colored lenses.
  2. This is one of the lenses that has actually been rumored, but as a full-frame lens.
  3. This is probably the most surprising lens. Many were hoping for a long macro lens. Sony has instead released a short macro. This lens is effectively the APS-C equivalent of the 50/2.8 Macro.
  4. The 18-55 will be the new kit lens. It's unfortunate that they dropped the 70 mm at the long end, because this was what set the 18-70 apart from the competition.
  5. This one looks exactly like the current 55-200, just with the silver ring added. So this is not really a new lens, it just has an updated finish to match the rest of the line.
  6. This one may be just a re-issue of the Konica Minolta 28-75/2.8. I don't see how this lens makes sense. Sony has discontinued the 24-105/3.5-4.5, and many were hoping for a new 24-105/4 to fill the gap. But Sony did not fill the gap. A 28-75/2.8 competes more with the Carl Zeiss 24-70/2.8. Of course, the new lens will certainly be cheaper, but I think a similarly priced, wider and slower lens would have made much more sense.

We should not be too surprised to see so many DT lenses. The α900 and associated full-frame lenses (16-35, 24-70, 70-400) were released last year, and this year it's time for another round of APS-C equipment. The new DT lenses are surely paving the way for new APS-C cameras.

EDIT: Added links to lens database.
EDIT 2: Added image.


Readers' comments

There are 3 comment(s):
#1: Comment posted by CyberGene on March 10, 2009 - 10:07:20 AM:
Why do you think 28-75/2.8 doesn't make sense? Actually the only full-frame lens from Sony in this range is the CZ 24-70 which is quite expensive. Now, here is what would not make sense to me - if these two lenses have similar prices. Why would you buy a Sony lens when you can buy CZ lens for the same price? So, it is obvious that the new lens will be cheaper and that perfectly makes sense to me. If we have to speculate, I am pretty sure it is a rebadged Minolta or Tamron 28-75.
Michael Hohner answers:
With "similar price" above I was comparing the new 28-75/2.8 and a hypothetical 24-105/4. I was not expecting such a 24-105/4 to cost as much as the current 24-70/2.8.
#2: Comment posted by Alexramos on April 13, 2009 - 10:42:40 PM:
I agree...

Sony needs f/4 FF lenses.
Maybe a 24-105 f/4 and 70-200 f/4 with new G design (70-300 and 70-400) will be more interesting about $800-$1000 and then a 16-40mm f/4.
All will be useful in APS-C cameras.
#3: Comment posted by flashgumby on May 02, 2009 - 01:27:30 PM:
I agree too. It's not that I don't like the 28-75, but it doesn't replace the 24-105 at all. I can see used prices for a clean 24-105 going through the roof.
The rumoured 24-105/4 (or similar) is really needed to fill a gaping hole in the Sony lineup, and if they have any sense at all they'll do a re-design of the beercan to capitalise on that market while they're at it.
One thing they really need to do though, is keep a lid on prices. In the electronics world Sony can charge a premium for the name, but in the camera world, they are not the king and need to remember that there is well-established competition, both of whom have the brand recognition card up their sleeves.

Share/Bookmark